简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
Abstract:In this expert-led Velocity Trade review, we assess the broker’s regulatory status, trading solutions, and global execution strengths. Learn about pros, cons, and key risks.
We have conducted a comprehensive analysis of Velocity Trade, and our conclusion is clear: the broker currently holds no valid regulatory license from any recognized financial authority. Despite marketing itself as a global institutional broker with multi-asset access, its lack of verified oversight from bodies such as the FCA, ASIC, or MAS significantly undermines its credibility.
From a risk-first perspective, this is critical. Clients trading through an unregulated broker are not protected by financial safeguards like investor compensation schemes, dispute resolution mechanisms, or segregated client fund policies. This creates considerable exposure, especially in volatile markets or during withdrawal disputes.
We reviewed the companys structure, which includes multiple international offices and a declared global presence. However, without concrete proof of current regulatory supervision—especially in high-trust jurisdictions—these claims offer little assurance to serious traders. The danger lies not in the services they promote, but in the legal ambiguity behind them.
🛑 Important Note: According to our internal verification and cross-check with regulatory databases, Velocity Trade is not a regulated broker. Please be aware of the financial and legal risks involved.
Here‘s our expert evaluation of Velocity Trade’s strengths and weaknesses based on extensive research and testing:
Pros | Cons |
Offers a wide range of global assets, including FX, equities, and commodities | Not regulated by any major authority (FCA, ASIC, MAS, etc.) |
Operates in multiple jurisdictions with local offices | No investor protection or compensation scheme |
Advanced execution tools for institutional clients | Lacks transparency on trading conditions and fees |
DMA, algorithmic execution, and API support |
When we began our evaluation of Velocity Trade, we expected a fully licensed multi-jurisdictional firm. After all, the platform heavily promotes its international presence across Canada, the UK, Singapore, South Africa, and beyond. But our investigation tells a different story.
We cross-checked multiple primary sources, including the official registries of:
None of these institutions currently list Velocity Trade as a licensed entity.
This is particularly troubling since the broker advertises its services to institutions that often require strict regulatory compliance. Even more concerning, its Singapore office claims to have a CMS license from MAS, yet this license is either expired, revoked, or unverifiable at the time of writing.
From a usability perspective, the Velocity Trade platform is sleek, focused on execution performance, and likely to meet institutional standards. But heres the catch: performance cannot replace protection.
Without a regulatory body to enforce ethical conduct, resolve disputes, or oversee capital adequacy, traders are left fully exposed in the event of broker insolvency, data loss, or withdrawal blockage.
We attempted to contact their customer service through the form provided on the website, but no response was received within 72 hours, raising further doubts about their operational readiness and transparency.
From an expert perspective, Velocity Trade fails our minimum safety threshold due to its unregulated status.
While it may provide fast execution, multiple asset classes, and capital market exposure, none of these features matter if your funds are not protected.
Unless Velocity Trade obtains verified licenses from reputable financial authorities and discloses this information publicly, we cannot recommend this broker for retail or institutional use.
Our Recommendation:
If security, regulation, and peace of mind matter to you, we advise choosing a fully licensed forex broker with proven client protections.
Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.